Drool!

Tools for Drools

A general guide to collecting and processing saliva

By Kelly Rae Chi | July 1, 2015



© DAVID TROOD/GETTI IMAGESHealthy adults secrete roughly 1 to 1.5 liters of saliva each day from three major pairs of glands that are in close contact with the bloodstream. Mostly water, spit also contains electrolytes and proteins, including glycoproteins that form mucus, enzymes that break down food and bacteria, and secretory antibodies.

Besides maintaining our oral health, saliva harbors clues about our ancestry and whether we might be fighting an infection, are overstressed, or have a hormonal imbalance. In the future, the watery fluid may even provide a rapid screen for a recent heart attack or distinguish between bacterial and viral infections. Indeed, characterizing the oral microbiome, the collection of all of the microorganisms in a person’s mouth, and its potential links to health and disease is its own emerging field. (See “The Body’s Ecosystem,” The Scientist, August 2014)

Who won the Civil War?

Raul Cevallos, a 2015 graduate of Texas Tech University, said he was taught at his Dallas-area high school that the war was caused by slavery. But he said a group he founded to create political awareness last year found that many young people are ignorant about history.

The group asked students three simple questions about the United States, including “Who won the Civil War?” for a video that later went viral online. “The Confederates,” answered one student. “The South,” said another. Others said they’re weren’t sure. But the same students answered questions about pop culture — “Who is married to Brad Pitt?” — correctly.

A shocker to those of you thought the Internet was the future!

Continue reading the main story

RECENT COMMENTS

Joey

 June 29, 2015

Netflix is television without the inane adverts. Instead of an hour to watch a program you can watch in 44 minutes and w netflix you can...

Laura

 June 29, 2015

Content is King.

Francis McInerney

 June 29, 2015

I'm not quite sure I get this. A liner media, TV, is dissolved into a non linear app soup -- an Information Singularity -- and it's still a...

  • SEE ALL COMMENTS

RUPERT MURDOCHrecently appointed his son James chief executive of 21st Century Fox, prompting the obvious question: How can a guy whose main credential is a silver spoon compete with Silicon Valley’s meritocratic coders and entrepreneurs?

I suggested that disconnect in a testy interview with James several years ago, when he was running his father’s satellite broadcasting company, BSkyB. “You must be incredibly stupid,” he said with trademark Murdoch dismissiveness. “Look around you, man. It’s television!”

Supremely confident that the Murdochs were old-media toast, I looked around, and it was in fact perplexing that BSkyB had, despite the Internet, become a colossus — one of the biggest businesses in Europe.

Another most counterintuitive fact: No matter the skyrocket valuations of digital companies, and the hype and press — much of it coming from digital media itself — people still spent more time watching television than they did on the Internet, and more time on the Internet was spent watching television. Indeed, the period since my conversation with Mr. Murdoch — a period in which almost everyone in media has uttered the words “digital is the future” — has been one of the biggest growth periods in the history of television.

Online-media revolutionaries once figured they could eat TV’s lunch by stealing TV’s business model — more free content, more advertising. Online media is now drowning in free. Google and Facebook, the universal aggregators, control the traffic stream and effectively set advertising rates. Their phenomenal traffic growth has glutted the ad market, forcing down rates. Digital publishers, from The Guardian to BuzzFeed, can stay ahead only by chasing more traffic — not loyal readers, but millions of passing eyeballs, so fleeting that advertisers naturally pay less and less for them.

Meanwhile, the television industry has been steadily weaning itself off advertising — like an addict in recovery, starting a new life built on fees from cable providers and all those monthly credit-card debits from consumers. Today, half of broadcast and cable’s income is non-advertising based. And since adult household members pay the cable bills, TV content has to be grown-up content: “The Sopranos,” “Mad Men,” “Breaking Bad,” “The Wire,” “The Good Wife.”

Looking for irony? Television, once maniacally driven by Nielsen ratings, has gone upscale as online media becomes an absurd traffic game. TV figured out how to monetize stature and influence. Nobody knows how many people saw “House of Cards,” and nobody cares. Mass-market TV upgraded to class, while digital media — listicles, saccharine viral videos — chased lowbrow mass.

So how did this tired, postwar technology seize back the crown? With old-fashioned businessmen in charge. When YouTube threatened to become a TV piracy site, television, led by Viacom’s 84-year-old Sumner Redstone, dragged Google, YouTube’s owner, into a painful spiral of litigation. A throwback like Mr. Redstone turned YouTube from pirater to licenser. He made Google hiscustomer.

Television, not digital media, is mastering the model of the future: Make ’em pay. And the corollary: Make a product that they’ll pay for. BuzzFeed has only its traffic to sell — and can only sell it once. Television shows can be sold again and again, with streaming now a third leg to broadcast and cable, offering a vast new market for licensing and syndication. Television is colonizing the Internet.

Streaming video is now not only the hottest media draw — 78 percent of United States Internet bandwidth — but, defying the trend, many of its creators are getting paid. Netflix bills itself as a disrupter of television — except that it is television, paying Hollywood and the TV industry almost $2 billion a year in licensing and programming fees.

The latest pseudo-crisis is the flight from the box — cord-cutting — but more people than ever are consuming television, and paying for it as they please on whatever screen. Well-produced, highly structured narrative video entertainment is so profitable that everybody in digital media — frustrated by tumbling ad rates and rising traffic demands — wants to be streaming premium video (i.e., television). Yahoo just cut its first big sports deal. Mark Zuckerberg of Facebook says that his company’s future is video. Just last week, BuzzFeed and the Huffington Post announced their new TV plans.

The fundamental recipe for media success, in other words, is the same as it used to be: a premium product that people pay attention to and pay money for. Credit cards, not eyeballs.

In 2014, Rupert Murdoch, at his son James’s urging, made a bid to buy Time Warner, quite clearly the opening shot in a battle that now involves all the major content owners, the cable Goliaths and the digital platforms — a struggle for primacy in the video industry. It’s not the digital revolution. James Murdoch is right. Look around you man, it’s the television revolution!

R&R Swindle?

The great rock’n’roll swindle – 10 classic stolen pop songs from Saint Louis Blues to Blue Monday

The history of songwriters passing off the work of others’ as their own is as old as music itself. Here are ten hits by artists including Bob Dylan, Elvis and New Order with parentage that’s debatable at best

Robin Thicke - Blurred Lines video
 The judgment that Blurred Lines was plagiarised from Marvin Gaye’s Got to Give it Up sent shockwaves through the industry. Photograph: Screengrab

1. Saint Louis Blues

Advertisement

WC Handy’s most famous, and lucrative, song was once the second most valuable copyright in popular song, but even he admitted that “the 12-bar, three-line form … with its three-chord basic harmonic structure was already used by Negro roustabouts, honky-tonk piano players, wanderers and others of their underprivileged but undaunted class”. In fact, the lyrics were little more than a clever composite of stray couplets heard in the clubs of Memphis and the streets of St Louis. As for the music, jazz pianist Jelly Roll Morton fired the first salvo at Handy’s lilywhite reputation in a 1938 Downbeat article, suggesting: “Mr Handy cannot prove anything is music that he has created. [Rather,] he has taken advantage of some unprotected material … [because of] a greed for false reputation.” Handy’s printed retort was that at least he “had vision enough to copyright and publish all the music I wrote, so I don’t have to go around saying I made up this piece and that piece in such and such a year … Nobody has swiped anything from me.”

2. Hound Dog

Jerry Leiber with Elvis Presley and Mike Stoller.
Pinterest
 Jerry Leiber with Elvis Presley and Mike Stoller. Photograph: Everett Collection/Rex Features

Hound Dog provided Jerry Leiber and Mike Stoller with a crash-course in R&B publishing. No sooner had they written it, in 1952, than it was copyrighted to Don Robey, who owned Peacock Records, and Big Mama Thornton, who recorded it. The culprit was producer Johnny Otis, to whom Leiber and Stoller had contracted their songs in the hope of breaking into the industry. As Stoller later told their biographer: “The reality of the cold-blooded music business was something else. Later, we learned that Johnny Otis [had] put his name on the song as a composer and indicated to Don Robey, the label owner, that he, Johnny, had power of attorney to sign for us as well.” Otis insisted to his dying day he rewrote the words, which originally “had lyrics about knives and scars, all negative stereotypes”. He even took the pair to court when Elvis covered it, having previously signed a release renouncing all claims to the song in exchange for $750. His claim was roundly dismissed, the New York federal judge branding him “unworthy of belief”.

3. Blowin’ in the Wind

Advertisement

Like Shakespeare before him, the first time Bob Dylan achieved public notoriety was as a “thief of thoughts” in an October 1963 Newsweek feature that suggested there was a “rumour circulating that Dylan did not write Blowin’ in the Wind, that it was written by a Millburn [New Jersey] high-school student named Lorre Wyatt, who sold it to the singer … Wyatt denies authorship, but several Millburn students claim they heard the song from Wyatt before Dylan ever sang it.”

Dylan’s naive decision to publish the song in a folkzine, Broadside, a full year before he released it gave Wyatt the opportunity to claim it for his own. Wyatt played it to his band in October 1962, nine whole months before Peter, Paul and Mary made it a hit. When asked where he got it from, Wyatt claimed to have written it. Surprisingly, when the Newsweek story was published, Dylan did not sue, but it would take Wyatt until 1974 to come clean. Dylan might have been sued himself over the song had he not wisely dropped its fourth verse, a straight lift from Joe Hayes and Jack Rhodes’s A Satisfied Mind, a song owned by the notoriously litigious Porter Wagoner. The tune itself, of course, was never Dylan’s. As the folk singer Pete Seeger noted, the night it debuted, it was a clever rearrangement of the traditional anti-slavery song, No More Auction Block.

4. House of the Rising Sun

Bob Dylan failed to copyright his arrangement of House of the Rising Sun.
Pinterest
 Bob Dylan failed to copyright his arrangement of House of the Rising Sun. Photograph: Getty Images/John Cohen

When Dylan failed to copyright his arrangement (which was actually Dave Van Ronk’s) of the 19th-century folksong House of the Rising Sun he left the Animals free to claim the electric arrangement they based on his as their own. In fact, only the Animals’ organist Alan Price had his name attached to “their” arrangement. The song went to No 1 on both sides of the Atlantic, and Price was suddenly a very wealthy man. Another American folk doyen was incensed to find he was entitled to nothing: Alan Lomax claimed he found the song first, in 1937, via “a pretty, yellow-headed miner’s daughter in Middlesboro, Kentucky, subsequently adapting it to the form ... popularised by Josh White.” He did nothing of the sort; White learned the song from “a white hillbilly singer in North Carolina”. White’s minor-key variant was the one Van Ronk, Dylan and the Animals appropriated. Moreover, the song had already been recorded three times before White got to it. Try as he might, there was no way Lomax could cut himself a slice of a song to which he did not contribute a single note or word.

5. Dazed and Confused

The idea for Led Zeppelin was one Jimmy Page had been carrying around for years: the problem was not finding the musicians, but original material. Yet, when the first Led Zeppelin album appeared, there were all these songs credited in some part to Page, including compositions by folkie Anne Borden and bluesmen Howlin’ Wolf and Willie Dixon, all still alive, all recopyrighted to Page et al. His most brazen acquisition, though, was Dazed and Confused, a song by Jake Holmes. The one time he was asked about the song, he squirmed: “I’d rather not get into it because I don’t know all the circumstances. What’s he got, the riff or whatever? Because Robert [Plant] wrote some of the lyrics for that on the album … We extended it from one that we were playing with the Yardbirds. I haven’t heard Jake Holmes.” Actually, Plant hadn’t written a single word of the song and, if he had, he wasn’t credited. Only Page was. As for never hearing Jake Holmes, the Yardbirds’ drummer Jim McCarty not only recalled Jake Holmes supporting the Yardbirds at a New York show in August 1967, but vividly remembers them going to a record shop the next day to buy Holmes’s album, having collectively “decided to do a version … We worked it out together with Jimmy contributing the guitar riffs in the middle.” Holmes, for reasons unknown, took until 2010 to make it a legal matter. And so, as a solution to the suit, when the version from Zeppelin’s one-off 2007 reunion at the O2 Arena was released in 2012, the song was credited to “Page, inspired by Jake Holmes”.

6. The James Bond Theme

John Barry was required under oath to explain exactly how he came to compose the James Bond theme.
Pinterest
 John Barry was required under oath to explain exactly how he came to compose the James Bond theme. Photograph: Collection/Rex_Shutterstock

In 2001, John Barry was finally forced to defend a libel suit brought by Monty Norman after for some years hinting that it was he who had really written the James Bond Theme, not Norman, as it said on every 007 film credit. When openly asked by the Sunday Times in 1998 whether Norman really wrote the theme, Barry was unequivocal: “Absolutely not.” Unfortunately for the newspaper, Barry was required under oath to explain exactly how he came to compose a theme Norman wrote a full five years earlier, under the name Bad Sign, Good Sign. Barry changed tack, begrudgingly admitting he did use the riff from Bad Sign, Good Sign, but he still insisted the rest of the tune was his – until an expert witness explained how almost all the theme derived from Norman’s piece. Barry insisted it was all a misunderstanding, and he had never intended to claim royalties on the song. The prosecution promptly produced two letters sent by Barry’s solicitors, threatening to go after Norman for all the royalties unless Norman withdrew his libel action. Barry lost the case, the Times faced a substantial bill for costs, and Norman was awarded £30,000.

7. Mbube/Wimoweh/The Lion Sleeps Tonight

Once upon a time, a Zulu singer called Solomon Linda recorded a traditional Zulu hunting chant, Mbube, for a local South African label run by an Italian immigrant, Eric Gallo, who had originally imported hillbilly records to working-class South Africans. The record was a minor local hit in 1939, the small sum it made going to Gallo, who had purchased the copyright outright from Linda, as was the norm then. One of these records found its way to Pete Seeger, via Alan Lomax. Intrigued by the song, he transcribed it (badly), rearranging it as Wimoweh and generously assigning the copyright to a nom de plume he and his fellow Weavers often used to claim 100% of the publishing on traditional songs (when only 50% was permitted). Gallo, to his credit, was aware enough to realise Wimoweh was Mbube. In exchange for not contesting the “Paul Campbell” credit, he struck a deal with Seeger’s publisher, Howie Richmond, which gave Richmond the US publishing for Wimoweh in exchange for Gallo administering the song in the English-speaking parts of Africa. Wimoweh was covered a few times over the next decade, once by Jimmy Dorsey, but only entered the financial stratosphere in 1961, when George David Weiss rearranged it completely, giving it a new set of words and handing it to doo-wop group the Tokens, calling it The Lion Sleeps Tonight. Only now did Solomon Linda’s snatch of Zulu become a genuine worldwide pop phenomenon, first with the Tokens, then Karl Denver and later Tight Fit. Linda had no copyright claim, but in 2000 the South African journalist Rian Malan took up the case in an article for Rolling Stone – starting a chain that would lead, eventually, to Linda’s descendants reaching a settlement that saw them win the rights to Mbube and secure a share of the revenues from The Lion Sleeps Tonight – which, having featured in Disney’s The Lion King, were huge.

8. My Sweet Lord

Harrison should have smelled the whiff of mendacity...
Pinterest
 Harrison should have smelled the whiff of mendacity... Photograph: Sunshine/REX Shutterstock

Delaney Bramlett claims George Harrison was backstage at a Delaney & Bonnie show in 1969, when “I grabbed my guitar and started playing the Chiffons’s melody from He’s So Fine, and then sang, ‘My sweet lord, oh my lord, oh my lord.’” Two years later, when he heard Harrison’s My Sweet Lord song on the radio, Bramlett called Harrison up to say he hadn’t meant for him to use the exact melody and to complain about the lack of credit. “But I never saw any money from it.” Nor did George, in the end. In 1971, when Bright Tunes Music – the publisher of He’s So Fine – first filed suit, the Beatles manager Allen Klein met with its president, offering to purchase the near-bankrupt company’s entire catalogue on Harrison’s behalf. He was refused. Harrison then offered the company $148,000, supposedly representing 40% of US royalties on My Sweet Lord. Bright Tunes Music demanded 75% of worldwide receipts and surrender of the song’s copyright. Harrison, having subsequently split with Klein, should have smelled the whiff of mendacity; Klein knowing the future value of this copyright, had bought Bright Tunes Music for himself. It was a clear breach of the fiduciary duty he owed to his former client, and the judge in the case saw it. Rather than the $2m Klein had confidently expected, the judge awarded him $587,000 in damages, the exact sum that he had paid for the company. John Lennon displayed little sympathy for his old friend George, suggesting: “He walked right into it. He knew what he was doing.”

9. Blurred Lines

The March 2015 judgment of an LA court – that Blurred Lines, Robin Thicke and Pharrell Williams’s megahit, was plagiarised from Marvin Gayes’s 1974 Got to Give it Up– sent shockwaves through the industry. Never before had someone – or in this case, their daughter – claimed copyright on a “groove”. Because, as Rhodri Marsden wrote in the New Statesman afterwards, “The view that it plagiarises is based on a fundamental misunderstanding of what songwriting is. Let’s be clear: these two songs are fundamentally different. They have different structures, different melodies, different chords. Were it not for the similarity of the sparse arrangement (an offbeat electric piano figure and a cowbell clanking away at 120bpm), the court case wouldn’t even have taken place.” One suspects there will be another case (Thicke has confirmed he will appeal) and the judgment will be overturned. That’s America for you.

10. Blue Monday

Peter Hook admitted that New Order stole Blue Monday off Donna Summer’s Our Love.
Pinterest
 Peter Hook admitted that New Order stole Blue Monday off Donna Summer’s Our Love. Photograph: Fotos International/Getty Images

Blue Monday famously became the biggest-selling 12in single ever after its release in 1983. What no one in New Order could agree on, though, was where it came from. According to Peter Hook, “We stole it off a Donna Summer B-side” (meaning Our Love, actually an A-side). Bernard Sumner admitted to further lifts, taking part of the arrangement from Dirty Talk by Klein + MBO, the signature synthesised bassline from Sylvester’s disco classic, You Make Me Feel (Mighty Real), and sampling the long intro from Kraftwerk’s Uranium. Keyboardist Gillian Gilbert didn’t think it ended there: “Peter Hook’s bassline was nicked from an Ennio Morricone film soundtrack.” But if Blue Monday had a starting point, it was Gerry and the Holograms by a group of the same name, an obscure Mancunian slice of electronica, released on Absurd Records in 1979 – which was actually send-up of music by arch satirist CP Lee, of Albertos Y Los Trios Paranoias, and his friend, John Scott. New Order all knew Lee, but decided the joke was on him. They were never sued.


Clinton Heylin’s It’s One For The Money: How Song Snatchers Carved Up A Century Of Pop by Clinton Heylin is published by (Constable & Robinson, £20). To order a copy for £16, go to bookshop.theguardian.com or call the Guardian Bookshop on 0330 333 6846. Free UK p&p over £10, online orders only. Phone orders min. p&p of £1.99.

Internet

Which foreign city is the world's most well-connected one for internet use?

Seoul, South Korea
Surprisingly, despite China 's 618 million internet users who spend an average of 18.7 hours a week surfing the net, China didn't even make the top 10 for internet connection. 
Seoul , Korea is a different story considering the average connection speed, availability,
(including free access), openness to innovation, support of public data, and privacy/security, Seoul , South Korea is the champion of internet-connectedness.
With 10,000 government supported free WiFi spots dotting the city,
and an internet speed that goes unchallenged globally, Seoul is an internet junkie's paradise.

Cycle

Which country is the most bicycle friendly in the world?
 

the Netherlands
By comparing cities using the average number of bicycle trips made daily, one city reigns supreme: Groningen in the Netherlands .  About 50 percent of the population commute via bike daily, making it the city with the greatest proportion of cyclists.